Quantcast
Channel: SCN : Discussion List - SAP HANA Developer Center
Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6412

Comparing Analytic view in HANA and Fact table in BW

$
0
0

Hi,

 

I am trying to create some Analytic views in HANA studio.

 

When I read the developer guide, I found, in Analytic view, we can place all the fields which can be aggregated and along with that say if we are using tables like VBAK, VBAP, VBUK, KNA1, MARA, MAKT, MARD, MARM a typical ECC schema.

 

My Attribute views are like below.

 

Att1               Att2          Att3

 

VBELN,

VKORG     VBELN   LAND1

VTWEG     POSNR  NAME1

SPART      MATNR  NAME2

VKGRP     MATWA  ORT01

VKBUR     PMATN   PSTLZ

GSBER     CHARG   REGIO

GSKST     MATKL   STRAS

ARKTX     TELF1

PSTYV     TELFX

POSAR    XCPDK

 

My Fact table contains

 

1) vbak-vbeln

    vbap-posnr

    vbak-netpr

    kna1-KUNNR

    net price

   discount

   any measurable fields

 

First I want to know if this is right (particularly regarding vbeln, posnr and Kunnr)

 

Secondly, as per BW multi dimensional modelling, I read that only and only Aggregatable fields like Price, Discounts, etc and NOT Sales order ID, Item ID and Vendor / Customer number can be placed in Fact Table.

 

I do not have any experience in Multi dimensional modelling. I am trying to draw comparison between the Fact table and Analytical View (they say it is used like a FACT table in BW).

 

Please someone clarify.

 

Many Thanks,

Krishna.


Viewing all articles
Browse latest Browse all 6412

Trending Articles



<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>