Hi folks,
Now that we have had HANA for almost two years and our content offering has matured we are taking a look at our package naming conventions and pros and cons to our current package layout. For example we have organized all of our content based upon functional area; ie: FI, PP, SD, MM, etc and finally MD for all of our master data (mostly attribute type views). I was just wondering how some of you are laying out your packages? Are you organizing like this or something similar? The pro for this method is if you want to find all your sales related views you can look in SD package however some projects cross multiple functional areas and that's sometimes the con for this method, it can be cumbersome to identify all of the different views that were related to the original project for example. Just wondering how others are doing this.
Thanks,
-Patrick